I'd be interested in reading it. However, as Pertinax suggests, I may be one of those that wouldn't aquire much new info except for maybe a cataloge of wreck sites.
I chuckled a bit at the "landlubber" comment in regards to the ship sheds.
I don't know of the specific latin word for them as in Greek they were called
neosoikos. Seems that for the Romans it was generally understood that they were a part of the greater
navalis or dockyard but weren't often called out specifically.
Other than allowing for maintenance during the off season, their key importance was to keep the hulls dry and light instead of waterlogged & heavy. Two reasons for this: 1. the obvious one was to keep them nimble for a sea fight 2. was to keep them light enough to be beachable for overnight encampment. The way I understand it, a trireme, pentekonter or the like wasn't just beached enough to not float away (mostly the bow), they were totally beached!
Even with 200 men, that takes a lot of muscle. If the timbers were completely waterlogged... forget about it.