Favonius Cornelius Posted September 26, 2006 Report Share Posted September 26, 2006 Caius Julius Caesar. Probably every educated person in the world is familiar with the name, for the man's life played a large role in shaping the western world as we know it. Few people in history can claim such an importance. Dissecting the aspects and times of this man has been an academic pursuit since right after his death to the modern day, so it takes a sharp mind and an expansive grasp of the history of the Romans to say something new, or put the story in a different perspective. I've read many of them, so it is with no small pleasure that I can confirm Adrian Goldsworthy's new book Caesar, Life of a Colossus succeeds in providing exactly that. Not a new age reinterpretation, ideological sermon, nor conservative rehash; Goldsworthy's book is a firm accounting and fair assessment, based on fact and sensibility of interpretation of the ancient histories.... read the full review of Caesar: Life of a Colossus by Adrian Goldsworthy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DecimusCaesar Posted September 26, 2006 Report Share Posted September 26, 2006 Excellent review Favonius! A brilliant balance between praise and critcism, It's admirable that you give your own view on Goldsworthy's theories. I have already placed the book on my wish list in Amazon. I am a fan of Adrian Goldsworthy's other work 'In the Name of Rome'. I shall be looking forward to reading the book. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M. Porcius Cato Posted September 26, 2006 Report Share Posted September 26, 2006 An interesting viewpoint on Goldsworthy's book, FC. You raised an hypothesis about Caesar's supply problems that puzzles me, however. On the one hand, Grant famously observed that "an army marches on its belly", yet you suggest that starving the troops somehow drove them forward. Is that your conjecture or Goldsworthy's? I can't find him making such a claim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaius Paulinus Maximus Posted September 26, 2006 Report Share Posted September 26, 2006 An excellent review FC and a very well timed one too as i've just returned home from work with my new copy of Goldsworthy's Caesar, i've been planning to buy it for some time but was unsure wether to because i've already read Christian Meir's Caesar and didnt want to waste good money on something that was going to just repeat what i've already read but i thought what the hell i'll give it a go and after reading your review it seems i've certainly made the right choice, now i cant wait to start it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P.Clodius Posted September 26, 2006 Report Share Posted September 26, 2006 An interesting viewpoint on Goldsworthy's book, FC. You raised an hypothesis about Caesar's supply problems that puzzles me, however. On the one hand, Grant famously observed that "an army marches on its belly", yet you suggest that starving the troops somehow drove them forward. Is that your conjecture or Goldsworthy's? I can't find him making such a claim. Caesar won, get over it...Nice review Fav. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Favonius Cornelius Posted September 26, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 26, 2006 An interesting viewpoint on Goldsworthy's book, FC. You raised an hypothesis about Caesar's supply problems that puzzles me, however. On the one hand, Grant famously observed that "an army marches on its belly", yet you suggest that starving the troops somehow drove them forward. Is that your conjecture or Goldsworthy's? I can't find him making such a claim. Thanks Cato. It is my conjecture, and I add it in just to give an alternative since Goldsworthy gives no in depth acessment from what I remember of Caesar's most criticized military weakness. It is an interesting idea isn't it? I think I'll start a thread on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virgil61 Posted September 27, 2006 Report Share Posted September 27, 2006 Nice thorough review FC, thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursus Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 Excellent review. I have just begin the work myself. Thus far I have no special praise or criticism. I do, however, think it is a lucid and interesting enough summary of events to recommend to someone with no prior background on the subject. As Cato said in another thread it is quite long and detailed .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spittle Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 I'm about 100pages into this book and its highly readable, informative and enjoyable. FC hit the nail on the head with his review. I have put the more academic T.J.Cornell 'Early History...' and Gary Forsythe 'Critical Early History...' to one side whilst I return to the 'lighter' titles such as this. Tom Holland's RUBICON was of the same stock and I intend to read his book 'AUGUSTUS' as well as giving the much mentioned Michael Grant a chance to please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursus Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 Tom Holland's RUBICON was of the same stock and I intend to read his book 'AUGUSTUS' as well When is Holland's book on Augustus scheduled to be released? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spittle Posted September 29, 2006 Report Share Posted September 29, 2006 According to Amazon the hardback was released on 31st May 2004 (They sell it for Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viggen Posted September 30, 2006 Report Share Posted September 30, 2006 Sorry I am confused, i only now of one new Augustus book coming out soon and that is from Anthony Everit, the only August book from a Holland is that from "Richard" Holland, or am i am missing here something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spittle Posted September 30, 2006 Report Share Posted September 30, 2006 My mistake. It is RICHARD Holland who wrote Augustus:Godfather of Europe. I'v just read Rubicon by Tom Holland and it lead me to this assumption. Does anyone know if they are related? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viggen Posted October 3, 2006 Report Share Posted October 3, 2006 we have added now Caesar: Life of a Colossus to the review section! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Favonius Cornelius Posted October 4, 2006 Author Report Share Posted October 4, 2006 Thanks all glad you liked the review. I hope the book is for you as good a read as it was for me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts