ASCLEPIADES
Plebes-
Content Count
2,115 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Static Pages
News
Blogs
Gallery
Calendar
Downloads
Everything posted by ASCLEPIADES
-
The speaker, whose rosy fingers can be found tracing out the hour of daybreak, would be Aurora/Eos? And then, of all her loves, who is most dear? Three possible ones: Astraeus, lord of the dusk, with whom Aurora had the most children (for what that's worth!); tragic Tithonus, kidnapped by Aurora and granted an unnatural longevity from which he begged to be released (again: be careful what you wish for!); and Cephalus, with whom Aurora had a brief infatuation with terrible consequences for poor Cephalus. Of these, the one most likely to muse beneath Aurora's bower seems to be Tithonus. Tough one, Augusta. Beautiful but tough -- like Livia I guess. Am I close? After such a wonderful expositon, I only wish you were right, MPC! Let me give you a hint. He is scouring the sky to learn the hour but not during the day. Is he Endymion? Is she Selene?
-
Salve, Lady A Is he Amphimaros? Is his love Ourania?
-
Frequency of Christian crimes against the state
ASCLEPIADES replied to Lost_Warrior's topic in Templum Romae - Temple of Rome
Salve, LW Can you identify some of those places? (specially if they are accesible online). -
Salve, Lady N It is an intriguing fact that, even if the Gens Servilia persisted in the Imperial consular Fasti as late as the end of the II century AD, all the numerous republican surnames reported here by you (and presumably the respective families) seem to have disappeared, replaced by some new surnames:
-
This comprehensive text correlates a lot of archaeological evidence from Italy with the semi-legendary accounts of the classical sources; by the 11th chapter (Decemvirate) you would have covered some 300 years of Roman history, like the first three books of Livy. You may find some good complementary material here at UNRV (like the section on the XII tables). Any analysis or commentary posted by you would be welcomed. Good luck and merry Mithras!
-
The first half (Ben Jonson's) is easily recognizable by those who may have majored in English literature in college. You are the goddess Artemis/Diana, of course. -- Nephele Of course, Lady N. Your turn.
-
Salve, Lady N Were the emperors Valerian and Gallienus truly Licinii? Was Egnatius their surname?
-
Sorry, I just wanted to play (sic): "Think of a god, goddess, hero, nymph, etc. from classical legend and describe him or her in a rhyming couplet. Whoever guesses the riddle correctly, gets to pose the next rhyming riddle". I just didn't pick the originality clause. None of the rhyming couplets posted by me on this thread is from my own; I'm a lover, not a poet. BTW, Ben Johnson's is just the first half; the second is from Catullus.
-
"QUEEN and huntress, chaste and fair, Now the sun is laid to sleep, Seated in thy silver chair, State in wonted manner keep: Hesperus entreats thy light, Goddess excellently bright. Come then you lads and lasses, sing In her honour now a hymn. Daughter-goddess of mighty Jove And lovely Queen Latona, who By Delia placed an olive tree"
-
Salve, V You should actually post this one as a thead in Romana Humanitas.
-
Salve, Amici For this and related topics, the first question is always the same: What is the author's working definition for the Fall of Rome? More than half the authors I have checked on have extensively argued why it happened without actually explaining what it was (at least for each one of them).
-
Why would some countries beg for being annexed by the Roman Republic?
ASCLEPIADES replied to ASCLEPIADES's topic in Res Publica
Sorry; what I was asking if if the royal wills were made public before the King's death; only so they would have been able to become an evidence of loyalty to Rome in any meaningful way for the wills' authors, as you suggested. Was that tyhe case? Actually we haven't dealt with this argument yet; simple it is indeed, and so is the obvious question: What prevented the Roman Senate from taking the provincial revenues for itself? (In fact, it seems that was exactly what they did) After all, according to W. Smith's Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities article on Senatus (by HF Pelham): , "...it was the senate which determined what a province should pay, and in what form; which granted exemptions, increased the amount, or altered the mode of collection... ... It was the senate which sanctioned the expenditure, which directed the payments to be made from the treasury--except where these were in a few cases fixed by law,--and which authorised the striking and issue of coins in Rome... ...The organisation, in the first instance, of a new province was usually carried out by a commission of senators in accordance with a decree of the senate, and it was by the senate, as a rule, that any subsequent modifications in its constitution were made, and regulations laid down as to the methods of its administration ". -
Irrespectively of Mr Shenkman's hypothesis, Lady N had a concrete and direct question that remains not entirely answered; in fact, it seems there is currently no scholar consensus.
-
Plinius.
-
Salve, DD
-
Why would some countries beg for being annexed by the Roman Republic?
ASCLEPIADES replied to ASCLEPIADES's topic in Res Publica
If the wills were by definition posthumous, what benefit would Attalus, the Ptolemies and the other kings get by then from showing such loyalty? Should we suppose rhe Romans knew the wills' contents in advance? If that was the case, it didn't seem to have helped Apion for getting the Egyptian throne, Why wouldn't these kings be able to change their wills as required? Even if the purported benefit was for their surviving families; what potential benefit could have been enough to compensate the Ptolemies for giving away the wealthiest Hellenistic kingdom? If the royal wills were all the enigma, the most economic explanation would be that the Romans simply faked such documents. But why would the Romans get into such trouble if they were going to reject the donation in the first place? (Admittedly that was far from being always the case; the Senate seemed to have had no problem in making the rich Asia a Roman province at once). It makes sense the idea that a group of Romans may have been the only ones able to opposse another group of Romans at the time. Even so, I stll can't follow the rationale here. -
Was this war justified? Did it even help Rome?
ASCLEPIADES replied to ASCLEPIADES's topic in Imperium Romanorum
I understand the spoils from the campaigns of Scipio Asiaticus (DLXIV AUC / 190 BC), Pompeius Magnus (DCXCI AUC / 63 BC) and Octavius Caesar (DCCXXIII AUC / 31 BC) were each one of them enough to produce significant deflation and other persistent macroeconomical effects. Anyway, spoils came just once from any conquest. I would be more interested in the long term economic effects; revenues, explotaition and so on. The more subjugated territories, the better? -
Money question: Ancient Rome AD 160- early 200s
ASCLEPIADES replied to guy's topic in Romana Humanitas
Merci pour cette b -
Indeed it is, Lady Magistra. Are you Narcissus?
-
Was this war justified? Did it even help Rome?
ASCLEPIADES replied to ASCLEPIADES's topic in Imperium Romanorum
Even if most Roman allies eventually finished as client states, both terms are not synonymous, not even for the Romans. For example, Carthage was a Roman ally during the Pyrrhic Wars; it became a client state only after the end of Punic War II. By consideration, do you mean... ... Archelaus of Judea, freezing at his exile in Gaul? ... Or the executed Antiochus of Commagene? ... Or the deposed Malichus of Nabatea? Please remember who wrote this; Caius Suetonius Tranquillus was the number 1 fan of Divus Augustus' club. -
Roman influence on Christian doctrine?
ASCLEPIADES replied to caesar novus's topic in Templum Romae - Temple of Rome
That demotic Greek was the lingua franca . -
Throned in splendor, O blessed goddess, Child of Zeus, Enchantress, I implore thee Slay me not in this distress and anguish, Lady of beauty. All in smiling wreathed thy face immortal, Bade me tell thee the cause of all my suffering, Why now I called thee; What for my maddened heart I most was longing.
-
The Praetorians and the Corporis Custodes
ASCLEPIADES replied to Caesar CXXXVII's topic in Imperium Romanorum
No correlation at all. The Praetorian cohorts came at least from the middle Republic. During the Civil Wars their loyalty was never completely assured, so foreign mercenaries were regarded as more reliable. Augustus actually had two units, one of Hispanians (Caligurritani) and other of Germans (Germani Corporis Custodes: Suetonius, Vita Divus Augustus cp.XLIX). Even the general Statilius Taurus (Salvidienus Rufus successor) had his own Germani Corporis Custodes, accorfing to epigraphic evidence. They were a de facto private paramilitary force, aside from the regular army. They acted as infantry in the palace and as cavalry in the field. They seem to have been predominantly Batavians. Caius (aka Caligula) actually gave some "thracian" gladiators the command of the guard (Suetonius, Vita Caius, cp. LV) . As his namesake (CJ Caesar) Caius got overconfident, so Cassius Chaerea and the other conspirators were able to surround him within a covered passage, far from the German guard, which subsequently killed many conspirators and bystanders (ibid. cp LVIII). Aggripina Minor had his own German guard until Nero deprived her for offending him (ibid Vita Nerocp. XXXIV). They abandoned Nero in the face of Galba's uprising (ibid cp. XLVIII). The German cohort was finally disbanded by Galba and send back to their native country withoutany reward, alleging that they may favoured Cn. Dolabella, another imperial pretender (ibid Vita Galba, cp XII). -
You wont make a good hagiographer; too much checking sources zeal!