caldrail 152 Report post Posted July 19, 2010 The british rebellion would have happened anyway since the causes were local, and since the judaeans were always a people whose uncomfortable relationship with the Romans caused friction, and since the Romans had little regard for their sensibilities, then rebellions weren't entirely unexpected there either. In both regions a better emperor probably wouldn't have stopped the trouble from occuring. The seeds of those conflicts had already been sown earlier, and a better emperor would not have prevented Roman bad behaviour until after it had happened and he'd been made aware of it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites