Jump to content
UNRV Ancient Roman Empire Forums
Sign in to follow this  
Pantagathus

Slingers

Recommended Posts

I considered starting a new thread on this but didn't think it would last long so I placed it in the 'Weapons' thread. However, even there it seemed DOA so here I am, again giving the subject it's own home...

 

We often overlook the Slingers!

 

They were usually a small portion of auxillaries (~1000 men) in various armies but were important enough that many generals went out of their way (most notably the Balearics) to recruit them. Hannibal employed them, Caesar employed them, Cyrus the Great, Pompey, etc...

 

Great article:

The Use of The Sling Among The Ancients - Walter Hawkins

 

It would have been a skill that I personally would have liked to have mastered (as a back up of course)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What battle did Alexander the Great fight where he moved his cavalry laterally hiding a few hundred slingers following alongside them and was shadowed by the Persian cavalry? He suddenly made a charge into the rear flank of the Persian foot exposing the slingers who unloaded on the Persian cavalry to prevent their pursuit.

 

Slingers firing individually could be an big irritant but doing so in mass--several hundred small missiles coming at you at high velocity--must've been hell.

Edited by Virgil61

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What battle did Alexander the Great fight where he moved his cavalry laterally hiding a few hundred slingers following alongside them and was shadowed by the Persian cavalry? He suddenly made a charge into the rear flank of the Persian foot exposing the slingers who unloaded on the Persian cavalry to prevent their pursuit.

 

Slingers firing individually could be an big irritant but doing so in mass--several hundred small missiles coming at you at high velocity--must've been hell.

 

I'm not sure what battle that was Virgil. It's been a while since I brushed up on my Alexander campains. :(

 

Depending on how good the slinger was, I would venture to say they were more than a mere irritant. Balerics were said to be able to hit where ever they wished. I can imagine getting struck by a high velocity, sharp, almond shaped stone in the face or eye was not very fun. Debilitating is probably a more appropriate term... :)

Edited by Pantagathus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Were they really diamond shaped? Every slingstone I have seen is oval. I always imagined this was so because sharp edges would cause the flight pattern of the stone to become erratic and this aiming would be much harder. The only exception I have seen are ballista shot, and some of those seemed to have a little crest used to guide the rock across the firing chamber.

 

Slingers have considerable advantage over archers in that you need less strength to use and ammo is always plentiful! Equal skill is needed however, I've tried many times to use a sling and I still can't get it right. :)

 

Interesting to note that many rocks found at sites have little things like 'take this!' etched into the rock.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would manage to hit myself in the head with the sling. I can't even figure out how it works :)

 

Oh ya...I've done that too don't worry LOL

 

You spin it around, either your head or by your side whatever your style is. I think the trick is the release. I have been able to get rocks to fly well, but never straight. I imagine maybe you need to release just before on its spinning path, or have some way to hold the sling itself such that the sling opens up smooth and does not inhibit the rock's path as it leaves. I'm sure there is a book out there somewhere on this but I've never investigated that far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How do you "release" without letting go of the whole thing?

 

It's not easy; i believe it is a kind of a flick of the wrist or arm that causes the missile to leave the sling uninhibited. It'd take a fair bit of practice to perfect, but once the action was honed, the slingers would become very deadly for their speed and accuracy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I could never understand why the Romans didn't develope archers more instead of slingers...

 

Zeke

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Slings are very cheap and most of the mediterranean populace widely used them from childhood,so you have a good recruitment of slingers.Archers weaponry is more expensive to produce(especially the ammunition),but the slingers are just as effective,so you dont gain much by recruiting/training Archers.Of course,it doesnt hurt to recruit Archers for Auxillia units,from peoples who are allready adept at using the bow.

L

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes sense. Also, once an archer is out of arrows,he's done. A slinger can pick up a rock, or even a nut from the ground. Slingers are almost never out of ammo.

Edited by Lost_Warrior

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Slingers were deadly to military units, unprotected by a shield or armor. Slingers were very affective against calvary, and the battle where, Alexander moved his slinger behind his calvary, while moving laterally. When ready Alexander broke off with his calvary, and his slinger made sort work of the persian calvary and infantry in range.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not believe that the Parthians used slings against the Macedonians. I think the Parthians had archers, lots of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Map of the Roman Empire

×