Jump to content
UNRV Ancient Roman Empire Forums

Recommended Posts

The testudo was simply a way of avoiding casualties from missile fire. As an offensive formation it had the dsadvantage of being unmanoeverable - rather like the phalanx as you say. Too much emphasis has been placed on the testudo. It would only have been used where enemy archers/slingers or castle defenders were a positive danger.

 

No, I'm going to rephrase that. The testudo wasn't unmanoeverable as such, it wasn't flexible enough for general use.

Edited by caldrail

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tommh

 

http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/ancient/polybius-maniple.html

 

reply

 

thanks for the links

 

=====

 

Eunapius Titus question?

 

Q? I'm afraid that testudo was...only...

 

reply

 

no, it is a tactical formation... use like the phalanx to push the enemy battle line.

 

xxx

 

Q? in the fact that both formations require the men to retain a rigid formation with limited mobility.

 

reply

 

no, it have tactical purpose...

why lock in formations that 'require the men to retain a rigid formation with limited mobility. '

if it have no reason and military purpose.

 

if you are the legate, will you do it without reason at all.

 

xxx

 

Q? ... in a testudo formation attempting to push through a phalanx, or any other group of enemies.

 

reply

 

yes,

use as defensive form- to block or impede the forwarding move of enemy line,

like a "big stone wall" of hasta [ square form ] of pallisade in the way of phalanx.

 

or as offensive form- to slowly assault "only part" the enemy frontal line,

to create a breakage in the weak enemy battle line and make a hole in the enemy front.

 

xxx

 

Q? The testudo has one simply, unadulterated purpose: missle protection.

 

wrong, when the roman legiones was under missile attack, they simply raise the

men second liner scutum shields to cover the head of the frontal liner men.

 

it is not testudo form or it is never been called a tortoise military formation.

because it is the Hastatus basic form... a hastati battle line formation.

 

 

xxx

 

caldrail

 

Q? The testudo was simply a way of avoiding casualties from missile fire.

 

reply

 

wrong, testudo was not mean to be for the use against protection from missile fire.

 

testudo was a tortoise military formation like a "little big square"

smaller copycat of the The Macedonian Phalanx formation.

 

 

Q? As an offensive formation it had the disadvantage of being unmanoeverable.

 

reply

 

the testudo was only mean "to move forward or rearward"

and use as a blocking detach force or use as a attack detach force

in form of "little big square" pallisade of hasta.

 

xxx

 

Testudo was a tortoise form military formation . rad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would also note that it wasn't even necessarily important to fully flank the said phalanx. To simply get the Roman line orientated slightly past the left edge (the Romans' left) would be disastrous for the phalanx. The reason is simple: The last man had only half shield coverage, and only an ungainly pike to defend the other half.

 

Now, granted. I wouldn't want to be one of the hastatii pushing my way using the curved scutum through the wall of pikes in front of me. But if a small number of soldiers managed to force members of the phalanx to revert to using their swords or to fall back from position, the stability of the phalanx is greatly reduced. Mix that with a hail of pila and a second line of fresh, more experienced principes to finish off the formation, and you can see why a manipular Republican legion would have an advantage over a pure phalanx.

 

However, by the time of Rome's rise, most Greek and Hellenistic phalanx-based armies were much more complex, using skirmishers, archers, strong cavalry, and elephants along with more fluid leadership styles. Using these, it was possible to return the favor and break the legion's ranks. This led to the many great battles and struggles between Hellenistic nations and Rome.

 

Good point on the vulnerability of the "left" side. I seem to remember reading some place that the Romans tended to put their best men on the left side of their formations. Can't find the reference now. This would seem to make sense putting your best men on the side where an opponent would not have the use of their shield.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tommh

 

http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/ancient/polybius-maniple.html

 

reply

 

thanks for the links

 

=====

 

Eunapius Titus question?

 

Q? I'm afraid that testudo was...only...

 

reply

 

no, it is a tactical formation... use like the phalanx to push the enemy battle line.

 

xxx

 

Q? in the fact that both formations require the men to retain a rigid formation with limited mobility.

 

reply

 

no, it have tactical purpose...

why lock in formations that 'require the men to retain a rigid formation with limited mobility. '

if it have no reason and military purpose.

 

if you are the legate, will you do it without reason at all.

 

xxx

 

Q? ... in a testudo formation attempting to push through a phalanx, or any other group of enemies.

 

reply

 

yes,

use as defensive form- to block or impede the forwarding move of enemy line,

like a "big stone wall" of hasta [ square form ] of pallisade in the way of phalanx.

 

or as offensive form- to slowly assault "only part" the enemy frontal line,

to create a breakage in the weak enemy battle line and make a hole in the enemy front.

 

xxx

 

Q? The testudo has one simply, unadulterated purpose: missle protection.

 

wrong, when the roman legiones was under missile attack, they simply raise the

men second liner scutum shields to cover the head of the frontal liner men.

 

it is not testudo form or it is never been called a tortoise military formation.

because it is the Hastatus basic form... a hastati battle line formation.

 

 

xxx

 

caldrail

 

Q? The testudo was simply a way of avoiding casualties from missile fire.

 

reply

 

wrong, testudo was not mean to be for the use against protection from missile fire.

 

testudo was a tortoise military formation like a "little big square"

smaller copycat of the The Macedonian Phalanx formation.

 

 

Q? As an offensive formation it had the disadvantage of being unmanoeverable.

 

reply

 

the testudo was only mean "to move forward or rearward"

and use as a blocking detach force or use as a attack detach force

in form of "little big square" pallisade of hasta.

 

xxx

 

Testudo was a tortoise form military formation . rad

 

As I stated, the testudo was a formation designed to minimise casualties from missile fire. In no way is it comparable to the phalanx and was never intended to be. Movement is necessarily slow, vision is limited, it cannot manoever effectively. Despite the defensive value of those shields, the testudo still remains vulnerable because it depends on zero casualties. Any unlucky legionary that falls away leaves a hole in the defenses that such a rigid formation cannot plug in action without exposing themselves to fire. When the testudo reaches an enemy group it must disassemble and return to a normal closed/open rank fighting block or achieve very little. If the testudo persists and attempts to push the enemy back, it really would be at risk of being surrounded. After that, a wall of shields won't help for long.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

testudo was best use in the frontal battle line engagement as a little big square obstacle to enemy,

or an annoying slow moving forward tortoise shape military formation that could be devastating...

 

Romanus legiones detach maniple assault group... that is moving towards enemy line.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, the testudo wasn't devastating at all. It was purely for protection. A formation like that cannot push the front row forwards without much cursing and bruised fingers. In fact, it would probably fall apart if you tried to. In no way was the testudo analagous to an infantry 'tank'. If it had been as effective as you say, then it would have been the standard method of roman attack. Quite clearly the romans didn't do this. A useful protective formation perhaps, but with strong limits on offensive utility.

Edited by caldrail

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

caldrail question?

 

It was purely for protection.

 

reply

 

the legio men will simply raise their shields to be protected from a volley of arrows.

it is not testudo.

 

xxx

 

A formation like that cannot push the front row forwards without much cursing and bruised fingers.

 

reply

 

Testudo was a tortoise form military formation . rad

 

it is not a linear battle line formation... but square...

and best use in the frontal battle line engagement.

 

xxx

 

A useful protective formation perhaps, but with strong limits on offensive utility.

 

reply

 

the Princeps Testudo formation should be use side by side with the Hastatus Battle Line formation.

 

the Hastati holding a battle line and then the Princeps testudo formation slowlly advance to

the enemy frontal battle line... if it breaks... the supernumerary ante pilanus will exploit it and

if the situations permits will do a flanking attack and pursue the enemy weakness.

 

i never say it is a superior alone tactic and manuever.

it must be use only when there is a battle line engagement... to be an effective...

and under the flank protection of the Hastati line... and other support numerary to be "devastating at all."

 

... and "testudo formation" needs a different shield than the "battle line formation" of the Hastati.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand your point, but really you've only underscored what I said. The Testudo needed protection? Or other troops to be devastating? As I said before - the testudo was used to the men to where they wanted to be without losing casualties. Once there, they had to do something else.

 

Raising shields against archery is quite correct. However, keep on doing that and you're going to get tired - and this is where the testudo starts to make sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

caldrail question?

 

The Testudo needed protection?

 

reply

 

could you kindly give your battle formation diagram, so we can comprehend your battle situation scenario.

so we can analyze how , where and who do the testudo... as you believe.

 

xxx

 

Or other troops to be devastating?

 

reply

 

the regular line Hastatus , Princeps , and Triarius never leave their designated line position.

even when the enemy battle line breaks, it is the medium and light infantry jobs to exploit them,

and when they totally rout, the legio flank cavalry pursue them to prevent enemy regrouping.

 

xxx

 

Raising shields against archery is quite correct.

 

reply

 

i agree

 

xxx

 

However, keep on doing that and you're going to get tired -

and this is where the testudo starts to make sense.

 

reply

 

do you mean the testudo formation will not tire them, holding a raise shield.

they use the same amount of energy doing it.

 

as my point say's... testudo is a kind of military formation use for an intended tactical manuever.

and not just for " "purely for protection" " against arrows.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding tactics, you're basically identifying the same thing as me. The testudo cannot effectively attack on its own - it must do something else when it gets there, or have someone do it for them. Also, the light troops supporting the testudo's prevent the enemy from surround the formation, pulling shields out of the romans hands, and plunging sharp pointy things into their suprised faces.

 

As for the shield question, get something around 5-10 lbs in weight. Now keep lifting it to shoulder height. Soon gets tiring doesn't it? Now lift the weight above your shoulder and keep it there. You can support that weight for some time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

caldrail

 

Regarding tactics, you're basically identifying the same thing as me.

 

reply

 

yes, as i have taken note...

 

xxx

 

As for the shield question...

 

reply

 

the shields will be rested in the head...

 

i was born and grow a poor child... when i was around 12 years old...

we get a saw dust by the sacks and put it in our head then walk by feet for around 3 kilometers,

the weight could be more than 10 kgs. and the event will take more than an hours to finish.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt they rested it on the head, but an overhead shield wouldn't be too difficult to hold there bearing in mind that other peoples shields help spread the weight (except for one rank!) and that the weight is comfortably centered over the shoulder.

 

I take note of your bag-lifting in earlier days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

caldrail

 

I doubt they rested it on the head,

 

reply

 

nobody know for sure

 

xxx

 

but an overhead shield wouldn't be too difficult to hold there bearing in mind that other peoples shields help spread the weight (except for one rank!) and that the weight is comfortably centered over the shoulder.

 

 

reply

 

are you sure, do you have taken precaution to consider what you say, by trying it yourself.

 

take for example the scutum technical consideration:

the height and wideness of the shield

the weight, position and location of the handle.

 

how long can you hold it with a bended arm? or over extended arm?

when the handle is in the center ? or almost at the center?

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

men in testudo formation do slowly walk with the continous shields covering.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Map of the Roman Empire

×