Jump to content
UNRV Ancient Roman Empire Forums
Gladius Hispaniensis

Belisarius' campaigns

Recommended Posts

Start with a general survey, I've mentioned Warren Treadgold's "A History of Byzantine State and Society" before, and I'll do it again here! If you can obtain a copy of it, John Haldon's "The Byzantine Wars" has a good chapter on the conquest of Italy. Definitely read Procopios! You cannot get more detail than him. Hopefully that helps, and good luck!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In the Name of Rome by Goldsworthy has an excellent chapter on him.

 

I'm reading that chapter right now!!

 

It's great, too. Good recomendation my fellow Antiochus!

 

Antiochus III

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In the Name of Rome by Goldsworthy has an excellent chapter on him.

 

I'm reading that chapter right now!!

 

It's great, too. Good recomendation my fellow Antiochus!

 

Antiochus III

 

I hate to do this, but my own take on the story is now available for pre-order on Amazon. Belisarius: the Last Roman General.

 

Although I'm slightly uncomfortable 'blowing my own trumpet' (after all, I am English!) I have tried to give as detailed an account as is possible of his career and conquests. Hopefully the editor/publishers will accept my request to include the large number of maps I have drawn that help to explain his movements, especially in the Italian campaign.

 

Once it is available, I was hoping that some kind soul (emphasis on 'kind'!!) would post a review? No doubt not everybody will agree with my conclusions, but I hope they will understand that I have attempted to omit any preconceptions whilst writing the book.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Look forward to reading that one, Sonic. Thanks for your efforts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I hate to do this, but my own take on the story is now available for pre-order on Amazon. Belisarius: the Last Roman General.

Salve, Sonic

 

Why is Belisarius considered by you (and others, of course) the Last Roman General?

 

I assume it may be because his Triumphus at 534 for the Vandal War against Gelimer was presumably the last one ever (and incidentally, maybe the first one given to any Roman commander different from the incumbent Emperor since Germanicus).

 

Am I right? Is there other reason?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I hate to do this, but my own take on the story is now available for pre-order on Amazon. Belisarius: the Last Roman General.

Salve, Sonic

 

Why is Belisarius considered by you (and others, of course) the Last Roman General?

 

I assume it may be because his Triumphus at 534 for the Vandal War against Gelimer was presumably the last one ever (and incidentally, maybe the first one given to any Roman commander different from the incumbent Emperor since Germanicus).

 

Am I right? Is there other reason?

 

That is definitely one reason for the title. The other is the nature of the 'title' holders. Belisarius was born in Thrace and spoke a version of Latin as his native tongue. After him, we have generals such as Narses, an Armenian who spoke - er - Armenian as his native tongue and was an eunuch. When relating this to the Augustan period, I felt that Augustus would have been (relatively) happy having a 'Thracian' as a general, but would have been shocked at the use of an Armenian eunuch: this was contrary to the 'traditions' of Rome.

 

Although I agree that he would have been shocked by the earlier use of Germans in very high positions, I think that this is probably the last time that he would have accepted the appointment without raised eyebrows.

 

Furthermore, there is continued debate as to when the Eastern Emprie became the 'Byzantine Empire'. I accept that this is a modern appelation, but I suggest that the idea of the 'Roman' Empire speaking Greek would have been unacceptable to the earlier emperors. Not long after Belisarius' death, the Empire became 'Greek' and this is a further point of departure: after this, the empire can be viewed as alien to the earlier emperors.

 

I hope that clears up some of the points! (If it doesn't, I'll gladly answer further questions, but please be aware that my time is limited! Even as I type, my son (Who is 3) is asking for attention: got to go!!)

 

Sonic

Edited by sonic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That is definitely one reason for the title. The other is the nature of the 'title' holders. Belisarius was born in Thrace and spoke a version of Latin as his native tongue. After him, we have generals such as Narses, an Armenian who spoke - er - Armenian as his native tongue and was an eunuch. When relating this to the Augustan period, I felt that Augustus would have been (relatively) happy having a 'Thracian' as a general, but would have been shocked at the use of an Armenian eunuch: this was contrary to the 'traditions' of Rome.

 

Although I agree that he would have been shocked by the earlier use of Germans in very high positions, I think that this is probably the last time that he would have accepted the appointment without raised eyebrows.

Gratiam habeo for your kind and quick answer, S

 

Sorry, but at least for me, it sounds a lot as if Belisarius was still a Roman because he was too good to be a Byzantine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gratiam habeo for your kind and quick answer, S

 

You're welcome.

 

 

Sorry, but at least for me, it sounds a lot as if Belisarius was still a Roman because he was too good to be a Byzantine.

 

Not at all. I've slowly come to the conclusion that Narses the Eunuch (sorry, I use the title because there was more than one Narses in the story of Belisarius!) was as good as - if not better - than Belisarius. In my view Narses t. E. is the first true Byzantine general, showing a high level of ability whilst not fitting the tag of 'Roman'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I imagine that the next great "Roman" generals chronologically are the emperors Maurice and Heraclius. Presumably they were more "Greek or Byzantine" than Belisarius?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I imagine that the next great "Roman" generals chronologically are the emperors Maurice and Heraclius. Presumably they were more "Greek or Byzantine" than Belisarius?

 

The main criteria I would use here would be their first language. It was Greek. Belisarius was the last general to attain 'legendary' status who spoke Latin as his first language. I think that the decision to change the language from Latin to Greek was really an acceptance of reality: Latin was no longer the first language of choice - if it ever had been in the East. However the change to Latin is the end of a distinct phase in the history of the empire.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a great admiration for Belisarius; An amazingly skilled General, and he certainly held true to the maxim "Semper Fidelis". I often wonder what would have happened had Belisarius followed through on his acceptance of the Ostrogoth's offer to make him the Emperor of the West, rather then merely using it to gain entrance to Ravenna. Could have been a clash of the titans between the East and the West, Belisarius vs Justinian!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have a great admiration for Belisarius; An amazingly skilled General, and he certainly held true to the maxim "Semper Fidelis". I often wonder what would have happened had Belisarius followed through on his acceptance of the Ostrogoth's offer to make him the Emperor of the West, rather then merely using it to gain entrance to Ravenna. Could have been a clash of the titans between the East and the West, Belisarius vs Justinian!

 

I offer my opinions on that possibility in the book.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Map of the Roman Empire

×