Jump to content
UNRV Ancient Roman Empire Forums
Sign in to follow this  
RomanItaly

Trajan Attack On India?

Could Trajan have invaded India?  

11 members have voted

  1. 1. Could Trajan have invaded India?

    • Yes
      6
    • No
      1
    • Dunno
      2


Recommended Posts

Assuming that a rebellion hadn't forced Trajan to withdraw from attacking Parthia, could he have attacked India after rolling through Parthia? Could he have totally annahilated Parthia? Also, how deep into Parthia did he go in before Parthia surrendered?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If anyone could have, it would've been Trajan, but even if he had been able to, the success would've been short lived. After his death, even much of the Dacian conquest was given up, so eastern additions would certainly not have lasted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, when Trajan attacked the Parthians in 113, he was 60 years old. When he stopped almost four years later he was a sick old man who didn't even make it back to Rome.

 

Just based on that, if he had buzzed through Parthia with no problems and held it with no rebellion Trajan still would have been far too old to attack India. He still had a fair chunk of land to go through to get to India and the native peoples have been known since ancient times to be implacable foes while an invader was in their homeland.

 

I say Trajan couldn't have invaded India since his manpower, money, resources and health were against it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say he could not have invaded India. His supply lines would've been stretched too far, making them easy tragets for the Ligh Cavalry of Parthia. Not to mention that he would surely face the problem that Alexander had in India, troop weariness.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe attacking is one thing, taking control another and to keep the area over a longer period even a more difficult task. In my opinion India was just too far away and for logistical reasons it would have been a bad idea...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It certainly would've been a logistics nightmare. And the potential for disaster in the west while the emperor was gallavanting around the far east certainly would've been an issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As written it all depends on your definition of "Attack".

 

Is a small troop poking their roman noses south of the hindu kush considered an attack?

 

However I feel safe in saying the chances of the romans invading and retaining India as part of the Empire to be next to nil.

 

Although nothing is impossible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Map of the Roman Empire

×