Jump to content
UNRV Ancient Roman Empire Forums

Movies


longbow

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

What kills me about all these Movies is thier recreation of battles.

Take a look at Braveheart and Gladiator. They show all the damn battles as a total mixing and cluster F#@k of troops. I mean it is common knowledge that most battle esp. ancient ones had very specific battle lines and formations. In which the only time they would loose any type of cohesion would be if one side became routed.

I hope Alexander is not like this...going to see it soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

King Arthur was a good movie, although somewhat lacking in big fight scenes. I hoped too see Roman legions in battle, because I can't seem to visualize the Checkerboard formation they had.

 

Alexander is waste of time. There he was portrayed as a homosexual, immature, whinner and a freak. The battle of Gaugamela wasn't good enough; it didn't show the oblique formation and the movie put too much emphasis on his mother. Damn

 

Troy is a superb movie. I just wish the Greeks fought better. I used to think they were invincible before the romans came and assimilated their culture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LordAbortion
They are generally all quite bad from a historical perspective.  I've learned to try and ignore and just enjoy the theme.  It's difficult, but it got me through Gladiator.

 

I think one of the best historically themed movies recently is Passion of the Christ.  I thought it was an excellent film.

 

yeah,p.o.t.c. was a good movie,but the roman torturers disobeyed there commander when they got carried away with the wipping.would they have been punished for that?what would the punishment be ?if any.The 13th warrior was ok,the one about the norsemen. :2guns:

P.O.T.C? I thought you meant Pirates of the Carribean. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Talking about the 13th Warrior, has anyone read the book it's based on by Michael Crichton, 'Eaters of the Dead'? It's fascinating, and it's actually an interpretation of Beowulf (Buliwyf, the Grendel, etc). Also, Antonio Banderas' character, Ahmed Ibn Fahdlan, actually existed for real (the first part before he meets the vikings is based on a manuscript dated to 922 AD), and Crichton just married the real with the myth. I really like that film, and I highly recommend the book, especially for Crichton's notes at the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...