Caesar CXXXVII Posted November 13, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 13, 2008 (edited) Ah, O.K. ASC' Read your posts , at first you said that Gruen did not denied that Cato was an enemy of the Scipio's and now -"There a many objections against Gruen and others' denial of an anti-Scipionic movement in the late 190s and early 180s BC" . No matter . Edited November 13, 2008 by Caesar CXXXVII Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASCLEPIADES Posted November 13, 2008 Report Share Posted November 13, 2008 Ah, O.K. ASC' Read your posts , at first you said that Gruen did not denied that Cato was an enemy of the Scipio's and now -"There a many objections against Gruen and others' denial of an anti-Scipionic movement in the late 190s and early 180s BC" . No matter . CC Read you last post; In this article, Gruen denied the existence of "an anti-Scipionic movement in the late 190s and early 180s BC", but he never denied Cato and Africanus were enemies. Do you see any contradiction? It matters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caesar CXXXVII Posted November 13, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 13, 2008 Ah, O.K. ASC' Read your posts , at first you said that Gruen did not denied that Cato was an enemy of the Scipio's and now -"There a many objections against Gruen and others' denial of an anti-Scipionic movement in the late 190s and early 180s BC" . No matter . CC Read you last post; In this article, Gruen denied the existence of "an anti-Scipionic movement in the late 190s and early 180s BC", but he never denied Cato and Africanus were enemies. Do you see any contradiction? It matters. What ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.