Between the imperial instititution of Rome and romanian political institution of "domnie" of Middle Ages and Modern Era it's continuity of content.
The romans were never able to maintain dinastic continuity and usurpers used what was the fragility of imperial rule and the reduce loyalty of the army to start new dinasties that faced the same problems.
The empire was divided in three large areas were succesor states ruled. The West adopted the political forms of the victorious germans based on e
This is a question that aroused many hot debates and because of this question romanian and hungarian history science was born.
Roman rule in Dacia was brief and difficult. In other areas they had a much longer time and better conditions, but latin did not survive.
The area of Dacia was for more then a 1000 years after the roman retreat roamed by migrators and still the language was preserved.
Hungarians said that romanians are migrators from the Balkan peninsula that setlled today Romania dur
I have 2 main objections to all political systems. First when a political movement gets power over state institutions it brings it's own people in the bureaucracy and they are often incompetent, corrupt or biased but they are untouchable because they have political support. Second, most political organizations have an ideology, a set of simplistic tenets that can not deal with the amazing diversity of reality, but regardless of how useless all ideologies are for dealing with real problems the ac
