Praetorian 2000
-
Posts
9 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Static Pages
News
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Downloads
Posts posted by Praetorian 2000
-
-
-
"Numbers is a big problem, Chinese are not "Barbarians" with low moral to fight. also Chinese have good weapons."
Well how do you know they can have low morale if they
-
-
"It seems your tactic of 'Rome vs China' is 'Rome will get everyone else vs China"
-
-
These are some of he links I
-
China Would win through Sheer weight of numbers. they could afford to lose 1 Million men in the war without too much economic hardship wheras a war on that scale would Cripple rome.
"China Would win through Sheer weight of numbers. they could afford to lose 1 Million men in the war without too much economic hardship wheras a war on that scale would Cripple Rome."
First off, I think the Han army was about the same size as the Roman army, maybe a little less.
Second of all, if the
-
Romans did have crossbows, but it was not popular with them. I'll give you a link later.
Rome Vs Han China
in Gloria Exercitus - 'Glory of the Army'
Posted
You want to count the whole Chinese empire, like the whole Roman empire, than it's +3000 yrs.
I was only talking about the Republic and the age of Caesar, I did not include the Byzantine Empire for the holy Roman Empire (they were NOT really the same if he asked me).
I know what you put there is not true, because the longest empire in history is the Roman empire, I