Jump to content
UNRV Ancient Roman Empire Forums

Antiochus III

Equites
  • Posts

    148
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Antiochus III

  1. It is quite one thing to say that Mother Theresa doesn't belong on a list of influential people; it is quite another to malign her with unbounded hatred.

     

    I disagree. While I personally don't regard Agnes Gonxha She's-Not-My-Mother Bojaxhiu with "unbounded hatred," I think that my own expressed distaste for her anti-condom advocacy in AIDS-ravaged nations (as well as a few other things about Bojaxhiu which haven't been mentioned here at all) is not without reason.

     

    It's to be expected that, when compiling a list of "Influential People," the virtues and faults of any particular individual may be discussed -- particularly when the fame of any particular individual might be due to some of those individual's faults having been perceived as virtues.

     

    I also disagree with those here who maintain that Bojaxhiu wasn't influential enough to have been included on this list. There are millions of people (not exclusively Roman Catholic) around the globe who not only revere this woman but who also regard her as an influential role model, despite some peculiar, anti-life notions of hers.

     

    -- Nephele

     

    You seem to be well informed about AIDS and africa. Would you care to inform me about it more? Also, I would be greatly interested on your opinion on whether the AIDS virus is a conspiracy by the US.

     

    Antiochus III

  2. Goldsworthy is an excellent historian, and he is well able to explain things both in depth and in detail. I feel like an expert on the punic wars now that i have read his book about them. Also, his book roman warfare is great, and cannae is good also. He definately uses the term subordinte ally quite a bit, at least in those books.

     

    Antiochus III

  3. I would like to get an idea of some quotes that you guys like, especially from Roman writers, or military commanders of the time (not just Romans but other commanding officers of rival factions.) Also, who was the first to say "divide and conquer"?

     

    Antiochus III

  4. I'm interested in what you guys think are the five most influential events of world history. I envision this as not including religous events, not because they don't have influence, but because if one does include them, they tend to always be at the top of the list because so many people are religous. I hope no one is offended by this, and I'm interested to hear your feedback.

     

    Antiochus III

  5. That was interesting, but actually surprises me little. Edison was more of a business man than an inventor, and was proficient at using other people's inventions and patenting them. Edison's electric company still exists today (AT&T) and has been having a monopoly on energy since edisons time. In fact, it was broken apart in the past, but has been piecing itself together.

     

    Antiochus III

  6. You really don't have to be "good" to be influential. I think you're making some decisions based on the good they made for humans. Influence can be good OR bad. Hitler definitely is hugely influential despite the atrocities committed by his government. People that caused much change for bad or good are influential. However, you act like Augustus was very great and "progressed" mankind, and was a good man. Do you really believe that? I also would like to bring up the fact the good and evil is just something that we recently came up with in the greater scheme of things.

     

    Antiochus III

  7. From a military perspective, the Byzantines really gradually became their own empire by developing their own types of soldiers, an idea I believe about all civilizations/empires. The Byzantine Empire still had the Roman influence, but it evolved to have completely different types of soldiers fighting in its armies. I still view the Byzantine Empire as Roman in 300-500 A.D.

     

    Antiochus III

  8. Lincoln simply freed the slaves because it was convenient. This is obvious. The imperial United States at the time needed a moral reason to wield its power. The war was fought over issues that have little to do with slavery. In history books, (basically propaganda), they make out the war to be over slavery, and only slavery. They literally glorify the North to no end. I'm completely serious about this. The reason for this is it makes us seem like good, moral people, while hiding our ruthless imperialism, which has been evident for almost our entire existence, and continues today with our illegal war in Iraq. Sounds like Caesar's illegal war in Gaul, huh? In fact, we renamed the dept. of war the dept. of "defense." Ironically, a war has not actually been fought on our soil since the Civil War, so the gov't is just using this name to make the US people believe war is justified, even tthough it clearly is just an excuse to steal Iraq's oil reserves.

     

    Antiochus III

  9. One very intersting thing about the Ottoman empire was that they allowed muslims to be pirates (barbary pirates) and the Europeans couldnt do anything about it till the 19th century. Barbary pirates took many slaves, too. Also, the Ottomans hadthe advatage in the late middle ages of having more scholars and such, with scientific knowledge greater than Europeans. Europe broke out of the middle ages in part because of muslim knowledge, and england and france had small cities, and a limiting feudal society with only a feew educated people. There was a golden age in muslim culture while europe was in the dark ages. But, the ottomans were in steady decline after 1650, andtheir power would never be the same after Suleyman the Lawgiver died.

     

    Antiochus III

  10. Great ideas. I actually compared the german invasion of the ussr to Crassus invading Parthia in a research paper because of the great purge, and the moderate instability of Pathia at the time. After carrhae in 53, the commander that dfeated crassus was executed. It just shows that in some cases the terrain/adaptation of troops affects overall outcomes more than strength of armies. Hey, never start a land war in Asia. Ha ha ha.

     

    Antiochus the Great

×
×
  • Create New...