Jump to content
UNRV Ancient Roman Empire Forums

aquilifer2k10

Plebes
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by aquilifer2k10

  1. Thanks for your reply!

     

    Elsewhere, the article makes reference to 'The Ancient Town'. Although this settlement's function was a port, it was also at the same time a town - by neccesity even, as a civilian population would be essential to maintain the local economy.

    Right, but you know the difference between a town and civilian population that develops around the outside of a fort or base (vicus)? For Boulogne to have been a Roman Town, French historians/archaeologists must have found remains of a Forum-Basilica located somewhere in the vicinity or something from an inscription or the Latin place name, Gesoriacum/Bononia, indicating it was a civitas, municipium or colonia.

  2. Britain being the exception, it seems rather difficult to find out the highest status of towns within the provinces of the Roman Empire. The Barrington Atlas, I've discovered, is a completely useless resource as it fails to attach a status to any settlement between village and town.

     

    BRITAIN

     

    Coloniae

    Colchester (Camulodunum)

    Gloucester (Glevem)

    Lincoln (Lindum)

    York (Eboracum)

     

    Municipia

    St Albans (Verulamium)

     

    Civitates

    Aldborough (Isurium Brigantium)

    Brough (Petuaria)

    Caerwent (Venta Silurum)

    Caistor-by-Norwich (Venta Icenorum)

    Canterbury (Durovernum Cantiacorum)

    Carmarthen (Moridunum Demetarum)

    Chelmsford (Trinovantum)

    Chichester (Noviomagus Reginorum)

    Cirencester (Corinium Dobunnorum)

    Dorchester (Durnovaria)

    Exeter (Isca Dumniorum)

    Leicester (Ratae Corieltauvorum)

    Silchester (Calleva Atrebatum)

    Winchester (Venta Belgarum)

    Wroxeter (Viroconium Cornoviorum)

     

    Unknown Status

    London (Londinium)

     

    Potential towns: Ilchester (Lindinis), Carlisle, Corbridge, Kenchester, Rochester, Water Newton, Richborough.

    Potential municipia/coloniae: Besides London, there are several other towns listed above that could have had higher status according to the author of Place Names Of Roman Britain.

     

     

    GERMANY (SUPERIOR AND INFERIOR)

     

    Coloniae or Municipia

    Augst (Augusta Raurica)

    Koln (Colonia Agrippinensis)

    Nijmegen (Ulpia Noviomagus)

    Rottweil (Arae Flaviae)

    Voorburg-Arentsburg (Forum Hadriani)

    Xanten (Colonia Ulpia Traiana)

     

    Civitates

    Baden-Baden (Aquae)

    Cannstatt

    Dieburg

    Heddernheim (Nida)

    Ladenburg (Lopodunum)

    Neuenstadt

    Oedenburg (Argentovana)

    Pforzheim (Portus)

    Riegel

    Rottenburg (Sumelocenna)

    Schleitheim (Luliomagus)

    Speyer (Noviomagus)

    Tongeren (Aduatuca Tungrorum)

    Wiesbaden (Aquae Mattiacorum)

    Wimpfen

    Worms (Borbetomagus)

     

    Unknown Status

    Bonn (Bonna)

    Mainz (Mogontiacum)

    Neuss (Novaesium)

    Zulpich (Tolbiacum)

    Waldgirmes

     

    Can anyone help with these last five or any potential corrections?

     

     

    GAUL

     

    Gaul is one of the hardest provinces to research towns, and I'm almost ready to give up, as no maps seem to state--even from recent issues of the Gallia journal--Coloniae or Municipia status for any towns. Everything is simply given Civitas status, when I know this doesn't apply to all Gallic towns. Even more bizarre is the classification of Boulogne as a town! I know it was a naval base, but what evidence is there that it became a town?

    http://www.nord-pas-de-calais.pref.gouv.fr...ra_boulogne.pdf

    Anyone read French? Does it mention anything about Boulogne being a town?

×
×
  • Create New...