Jump to content
UNRV Ancient Roman Empire Forums

Italian PM 'enhances' ancient Roman statues


Melvadius

  

7 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you think?

    • Original art work should not be 'enhanced' in this way
      1
    • Who cares it's only old stone?
      0
    • The man is worse than a barbarian
      0
    • What else do you expect from him?
      1
    • Unprintable
      0
    • I'm still laughing
      0
    • I'm sure it was done in the best possible taste
      0
    • You mean he didn't pay for his own enhancements?
      1
    • Who needs viagra when you have an art gallery to work with?
      1
    • Can't someone lock him up?
      3
    • He can do what he likes - he has the power
      0


Recommended Posts

Following on from innumerable gaffs, sexual misconduct allegations and general political and other 'foot-in-mouth' comments and actions Italy's current prime minister (Berlusconi) has apparently found a new way to get his name in the papers.

 

Is this something we should get upset about?

 

Italy's prime minister is under attack for authorising what amounts to plastic surgery on two Roman marble statues.

 

The statues, which depict the naked gods Venus and Mars, are on show in Silvio Berlusconi's Rome residence.

 

Mr Berlusconi ordered a replacement for the missing penis on the statue of the ancient god of war, and a missing hand for Venus.

 

Art experts say it is tasteless and aesthetically wrong to replace the missing body parts.

 

The additions to the two ancient statues, dug up near Rome nearly 100 years ago and now adorning the courtyard of the prime minister's official residence, were ordered personally by Mr Berlusconi.

 

The statues were formerly kept in a Rome museum

...continued

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Judging from the photos, the restored parts seemed tasteful enough. Not abig deal, in my book.

 

Possibly although I have a couple of issues about this. The first is that although coming from a museum the 'restorations' do not seem to have been done to full museum standard ie the internationally agreed standard is that any replacement should be fully identifiable as such and equally important the 'restoration' must be fully reversible with no damage to the 'origial'.

 

This leads to a second question rather than issue - did he apply to the Vatican Museum to see if any of their sorted and labelled parts (most of which were removed by Victorian period ladies armed with geologists hammers) originally came from these statues so could be used in the restoration? ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...