Jump to content
UNRV Ancient Roman Empire Forums
Guest spartacus

Ethnic Cleansing - Roman Style

Recommended Posts

Guest spartacus

We have seen Ethnic Cleansing in modern times such as carried out by the Nazis and more recently with events in Bosnia

 

Rome wiped Carthage away destroying everything, jews were persecuted as where christians, would it be true to say this was an ancient form of ethnic cleansing?

 

your thoughts please?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ethnic cleansing is a modern term for what humans have been doing for millenia, (Yeap, even before the nasty old Romans).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest spartacus

So P.Clodius, what you are saying is romans were no better than Nazis?

 

If so, should they be treated with the same contempt!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Scanderbeg

Some Emperors did persecute the Jews and Christians. Others did not. It just depended. Romans did not even do that much wiping out. They wouldnt want to simply because they were out to conquer and it would become like damaging their own city.

 

Carthage was an outside case. Even many Romans came to agree that razing Carthage was a mistake. They blamed Cato for the "Punic Curse".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest spartacus

I had forgotton about the Gallic and Belgic tribes that Julias Caesar tried to eradicate, smacks of ethnic cleansing to me!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And keep in mind, the Romans didnt destroy the Phoenician race in north africa, they just razed the city. Also, the Roman objective was to take slaves more often than commit genocide. Only in cases of extreme resistance (ie Caesar's conquest of Gaul) did the Romans exterminate entire towns. Its hard to blame the resistance, slavery or death being the options, but death wasn't the Romans first choice. Even so, the goal was not genocide as we know it today... extermination of a race... but simply the end of resistance to Roman authority.

 

While the result may be the same, the intention presents a fairly important difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest spartacus

Depends on your viewpoint and which side you were on PP!

 

Was not Julias Caeser infamous for taking booty and not so many slaves back to Rome!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There have been estimates that Caesar enslaved as many as 1 million Gauls and exterminated an equal number. Caesar himself made outrageous claims as to the number of slaves brought back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest spartacus

I would say killing a million people, in effect wiping out entire tribes is pretty conclusive for the case of Roman ethnic cleansing!

 

And thats one example!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I'm saying what the nazi's did is nothing new! Just the scale was different due to the industrial age. Before the Romans, the Syracusan's starved and tormented thousands of Athenian prisoners to death, the jews were persecuted long before 753BC, etc.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would say killing a million people, in effect wiping out entire tribes is pretty conclusive for the case of Roman ethnic cleansing!

 

And thats one example!

You are also misinterpretating what Caesar did vs. what more modern nations have done. Caesar exterminated Gallic Celts for resisting Roman rule. Those Celts who accepted Roman rule lived freely and were granted great favor. That is not ethnic cleansing. It is annhilation on a massive scale, but not ethnic cleansing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Scanderbeg

All empires have punished resistance. Even Alexander crusified(sp?) all the citizens of Tyre. He looted and destroyed Thebes and more. The Mongols destoyed any city that resisted them but showed great favours to those who did not oppose. Its a simple method to spread fear. To lower resistance. Im not saying its right. But its affective.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm beginning to sense an anti-Caesarian in Spartacus, or anti-populares! If you could go back would you be an Optimate? Would you ally yourself with Cato?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest spartacus

P.Clodius

 

Not sure, I would prob be an Activist for human rights I think ! :lol:

 

Pretty sure I would end up lion meat :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest spartacus

PP

 

 

If an entire tribe is wiped out by an aggressor, for whatever reason it can still be deemed a form of ethnic cleansing, because in effect you are eradicating the race, culture and religion!

I have not misinterprated any action by Caeser, I know why he did it, as you say because they would not comply to Roman rules but the fact remains he tried to remove all traces of their existence, which can only be construde as a form of ethnic cleansing !

I admire Caesar for his achievements but what he did was not right, no justification

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Map of the Roman Empire

×