ClashicalHistory Posted August 1, 2025 Report Share Posted August 1, 2025 Hi everyone, My name is Stuart, I’ve just released the first episode of a documentary series exploring Ancient Rome—not just its history, but the aesthetic and ideological machinery that shaped public perception. It’s a project built entirely with free software and a lot of sweat, aiming to fuse historical themes with modern parallels of belief, spectacle, and control. We’ve gone to great lengths to ensure every visual element is ethically sourced and deeply thematic—from guilloche patterns to red vellum textures—echoing Roman ritual while reflecting modern systems of ceremony. Crafted with care, this first episode explores how spectacle, ritual, and belief shaped public life in Ancient Rome—and what it reveals about power today. This first episode is a foundation for a larger series that will move from symbol to system, exploring the interplay between spectacle and truth. If you’re drawn to the intersection of history, ideology, and visual storytelling, I’d be honoured if you gave it a watch and shared your thoughts. 👉 (And if you’ve worked on similar projects, I’d love to hear how you approached your themes. Dialogue beats duplication.) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caesar novus Posted August 1, 2025 Report Share Posted August 1, 2025 (edited) Very impressive, and especially without the omnipresent hallmarks of AI generation. It's probably worthy of posting in "Romana Humanitas" or similar section. Beforehand I had wondered what the purpose was of the Alter of Peace. One thing that works as favorable Roman propaganda to me maybe wasn't intentional. I love the prideful memorial sculptures commissioned by freedman (status identifiable from their names) along roads leaving cities or towns. It tells me about their opportunity to thrive in a tough-love system. It reminds me of the the US treasury making plans to change the portraits on future US money about a decade earlier. They announced eliminating "stuffy" founding fathers of high ideals and replace them with new-age victimology figures. There was backlash even from the left in the case of Alexander Hamilton who surprisingly had just become wildly popular in a Broadway play as rising above oppression like Roman slaves. So I guess he will stay on $ symbolizing both right and left ideals, but anyone still using paper money in years forward may also be seeing paraplegic eskimo portraits or whatever. Edited August 1, 2025 by caesar novus 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClashicalHistory Posted August 11, 2025 Author Report Share Posted August 11, 2025 Thanks so much — I really appreciate your thoughtful response. I love your point about freedman memorials along Roman roads. That kind of prideful visibility is such a rich layer of propaganda, intentional or not. Your reflections on symbolic representation and public memory tie in beautifully with the next episode, which explores how astrology was used to legitimize authority in Rome. If you're curious, here’s Episode 2: 🎥 How Roman Propaganda Built an Empire (Without Social Media) — Episode 2: Signs of the Times I’ll definitely look into posting in Romana Humanitas. Thanks again for the encouragement! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guidoLaMoto Posted October 16, 2025 Report Share Posted October 16, 2025 I wanted to hold off commenting here until I had seen the video, but I've been pretty busy (for instance, my wife is due home shortly with some packages and I'll have to hold the screen door open for her) but It should be pointed out that there's a difference between propaganda and celebration. Propaganda is the Latin word for "things to be propagated." The construction in Latin usually implies the imperative- cf. Cato's famous "Carthago delenda est"- Carthage MUST be destroyed...In English, the word is usually used in the context of deceitful advertising to advance an agenda.... ...as opposed to celebration. For example, the Romans erected an equestrian statue to celebrate the heroics of Cloelia in 508 BC when Rome was little more than a village of shepards & farmers- hardly an act of propaganda. Who would see it but a few hundred Romans? Rome spread her culture throughout the conquered lands, building theaters, temples, baths and arenas, etc- all part of that culture. If those things impressed the vanquished, it was secondary gain, not primary intention. The one episode that does come to mind is Caesar building a bridge to cross the Rhine- certainly intended first to be impressive and secondly to be utilitarian. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.