Virgil61 Posted January 16, 2006 Report Share Posted January 16, 2006 Offered without comment. http://www.wtol.com/Global/story.asp?S=4362613 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M. Porcius Cato Posted January 16, 2006 Report Share Posted January 16, 2006 This is an interesting story in that it reveals the inherent contradiction of attempting to argue for censorship. How can you argue for censoring something unless you know what it is that you are censoring; however, if one is to know what one wishes to censor, one can't have censorship in place. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tobias Posted January 16, 2006 Report Share Posted January 16, 2006 (edited) There is certainly a bit of hypocrisy in the argument - but then there's always hypocrisy in every argument Edited January 16, 2006 by Tobias Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sextus Roscius Posted January 17, 2006 Report Share Posted January 17, 2006 HA! If I received the assignment, the moment I read the instructions I would've burst out laughing, then gone completely quite, walked up to the teacher, and explain why I thought it was inapropriate. But on another part of the subject Last fall the school principal accepted responsibility for questionable work-study credits given to a member of the football team that kept him eligible to play. The controversy led the team to forfeit four wins -- its only victories of the season and the first in two years. Why did they include that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.