Jump to content
UNRV Ancient Roman Empire Forums

Imperial Consuls


Ursus

Recommended Posts

Under the Empire, when the princeps was not a consul himself, he recommended the candidates. The Consuls held office for a few months before resigning in favor of suffect Consuls. After their tenure of office, a Consul could become Proconsul in Africa or Asia, or legatus pro augusti in the imperial provinces. Even under the Dominate, the Consulship continued officially and was used by the Dominus to mark out men who would command the senior province in a given Diocese.

 

 

The consulship was therefore a largely honorific position. But what did they do, precisely, for the few months they were in office? Even the praetors still had official duties at Rome. I can't find much mention of what the Consuls' official duties were. According to wikipedia they organized and financed high level public games, but they don't list sources for this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least in the later empire their chief duties were to give a name to a year and to put on games for the plebs according to Gibbon.

 

(Sorry Im using him so much but he's my handiest reference)

 

Since this useless honor could bankrupt a man it led to the extinction of the office.

I'd imagine in the principate they'd take up space and give the shallow impression of collegiality. :D

 

Since Ive always viewed the Roman's as being ultimately practical this impracticality of theirs is most interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you PNS, very informative and interesting!

 

The imperial praetors peformed much the same functions, only on a smaller scale.

 

It would seem the aediles and censors passed into irrelevancy and oblivion, with most of their functions transferred to praetors and consuls.

 

Since this useless honor could bankrupt a man it led to the extinction of the office.

 

Do you mean under the "Byzantines?" The Western Empire had Consuls for as long as there was a Western Empire. After tenor of their office they commanded the senior province in a given diocese.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you mean under the "Byzantines?" The Western Empire had Consuls for as long as there was a Western Empire. After tenor of their office they commanded the senior province in a given diocese.

 

Yes, Apparently in the Thirteenth year of Justinian's reign

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you mean under the "Byzantines?" The Western Empire had Consuls for as long as there was a Western Empire. After tenor of their office they commanded the senior province in a given diocese.

 

Yes, Apparently in the Thirteenth year of Justinian's reign

 

I believe it wasn't actually abolished, but given exclusively to the emperor from 541 onward. Merely a formality of course, but I don't believe the office was abolished (by decree).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Do you mean under the "Byzantines?" The Western Empire had Consuls for as long as there was a Western Empire. After tenor of their office they commanded the senior province in a given diocese.

 

Yes, Apparently in the Thirteenth year of Justinian's reign

 

I believe it wasn't actually abolished, but given exclusively to the emperor from 541 onward. Merely a formality of course, but I don't believe the office was abolished (by decree).

Maladict looks to be correct. Justinian I held the consulship while Emperor probably when there was no one else who wanted to fork over the large sum of personal money this symbolic office required. The great Byzantine General Belisarius held the honor only 6 years before it lapsed into oblivion. Wikipedia lists the last consul (In Constantinople of course) as Anicius Faustus Albinus Basilius in the year 541.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maladict looks to be correct. Justinian I held the consulship while Emperor probably when there was no one else who wanted to fork over the large sum of personal money this symbolic office required. The great Byzantine General Belisarius held the honor only 6 years before it lapsed into oblivion. Wikipedia lists the last consul (In Constantinople of course) as Anicius Faustus Albinus Basilius in the year 541.

 

Interestingly, Basilius was a westerner, and probably served his consular year in Rome, not Constantinople. He did take the ceremony at Constantinople, though.

 

As for what happened after 541, Justinian did not take the consulship himself after 541, and neither did anyone else. Justin II took it on his accession (566), and it was still in use during the reign of Constans II, who became consul in 642.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...