Jump to content
UNRV Ancient Roman Empire Forums

Germanicus

Equites
  • Posts

    827
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Germanicus

  1. I believe one of the charges against Piso, after the death of Germanicus was of sorcery. Or perhaps that was just thought because poisoning was seen as a branch of those arts.

     

    Sulla passed the Lex Cornelia de sicariis et veneficiis in 82 BC, largly aimed at poisoning which seems to have been lumped in with Sorcery as a dark art.

     

    The word Veneficium was also applied to potions, incantations, &c. (Cic. Brut. 60; Petron. 118); whence we find Veneficus and Venefica used in the sense of a sorcerer and sorceress in general.

     

    From A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities, John Murray, London, 1875. Another bit of quality from Bill Thayer

  2. If he had agreed to Caesar If he had agreed to Caesar (and he was not alone to oppose him) the Republic would have collapsed anyway

     

    There's no way to be sure of this, but we can be reasonable sure of why Caesar crossed the Rubicon under arms.

     

    Why don't blame Cicero for sparking the wars against Antonius?

     

    Because Cicero was well dead with a pin cushion tongue when they started.

  3. Wonder if there was an industry to copy these things

     

    Pliny mentions that Regulus (someone he had little time for) as having "counless copies made" of a memoir of his dead son.

     

    I'd envisage the wealthy educated classes as being the only audience.

     

    What is the Gazette that Suetonius often refers to ?

  4. What do you think Sulla had? Because he gave it up a couple years before he died doesn't mean that he didn't have the power to be dictator until he died. If that's the case, then the "Republic" fell decades before Caesar, however absurd that might be.

     

    I disagree. Sulla became dictator legibus faciendis et reipublicae costituendae, and the fact is that he reformed the constitution, then laid down the office because he felt he'd done what was required to replensih the republic. I do see what you are saying, but see Sulla accepting the office as saying - "Yes I will reform laws and fortify the constitution of this republic" where as Caesar said "Yes I will be Dictator for as long as I live and do as I see fit for the rest of my life".

     

    But our opinions differ and I feel never will they converge on this issue.

  5. question? how can the roman army not be effective? according to many people the roman army under ceasar killed a million men in gaul. comprehend the number 1,000,000 me thats a lot of men back in thier day that was rome several times over even more

     

    Yes, it was highly effective - but still lost plenty of battles.

     

    With regard to Caesar, there's every chance Plutarch inflated the figures, but yes, I'm sure he killed and enslaved plenty.

     

    That's kind of the point though - they did it under Caesar, the Roman armys effectiveness was directly linked to the effectiveness of it's leaders.

×
×
  • Create New...