Jump to content
UNRV Ancient Roman Empire Forums

Lost_Warrior

Equites
  • Posts

    2,601
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Lost_Warrior

  1. You know I've never thought of it like that.

     

    The "salvation" idea was one that was already present in Roman times. The Cult of Mithras springs to mind.

     

    I think it's fairly safe to say that anything that was present in any noticeable degree in Roman times got noticed, and shaped as the Romans saw fit. Christianity certainly didn't go unnoticed and as it gained popularity, chances are the Romans were using it in order to further their own agenda.

  2. Some of those military physicians were undoubtedly among the best of the best regarding global pre-Renaissance surgery.

     

    Agreed! I'm especially impressed by the use of smaller and smaller stuffing in the wound, in order to force it to heal from the inside out, instead of the outside in.

     

    Marcus does mention infection, and I think that may be a bit of modern knowledge slipping in there, because I didn't think that Romans were much aware of how "infection" worked. But the practice of not allowing a wound to heal from the outside in is sound.

     

    The probe makes me squirm, however. :blink: Especially when you remember that this would have been done with no anesthetic.

  3. You have to remember that Roman beliefs were very deeply rooted in religious tradition.

     

    Not only that, but the Roman State definitely played the "religion card" in order to hold more sway over their citizens. So Roman politics were deeply steeped in religion as well.

     

    Basically, these sorts of beliefs found their way into every aspect of Roman life.

  4. I do know that oaths and contracts, in many instances, were taken before the Gods. Iupiter Optimus Maximus (I believe) was invoked to witness the oath.

     

    As for the legal end of it, I really don't know. I'd imagine it would depend on the circumstances, but I'm willing to bet that most contracts were written. After all, a verbal contract is worth the paper it's written on...

     

    If someone couldn't write, I imagine it would be written up for them by someone who could, and the person in question would just sign or stamp it, or literate witnesses would certify that they had seen the parties involved make the verbal agreement.

  5. I stumbled across this in my wanderings around the web:

     

    According to some, Roman centurions pierced their nipples,

     

    This is the first time I've heard this, and to me it borders on the ridiculous. However, I don't know if it would surprise me any. (Same site also says that Egyptians pierced their belly buttons! I wonder about that one as well, as I've never heard it before.)

     

    Thoughts?

     

    What would the Romans think of something like this, anyway? I hadn't thought that body modification was practiced that much in the Roman world (well, not by "civilized" Romans at any rate.)

     

    (I wonder if this would better fit in Humanitas...if it does someone please move it? Thanks.)

  6. (swiped this bit from another thread)

     

    THE BANQUET was divided into 3 parts, the third part, the Secundae mensae, was the dessert, which at large feasts developed into a drinking party, or COMISSATIO.

     

    We have plenty of recipes for foods eaten at the banquet, but what did a Roman 'dessert' consist of? I don't think they had sugar cane, so I'm guessing anything sweet (that is, if they did enjoy something sweet after a meal as we do) would appear much different than what we are used to.

     

    Would fruit, such as figs (which are very sweet) be in order? Or were cakes sweetened with honey more likely? Something else entirely?

×
×
  • Create New...