Jump to content
UNRV Ancient Roman Empire Forums
Sign in to follow this  
guy

Caligula Statue : How Accurate?

Recommended Posts

I recently got this image of Caligula from Wikipedia (source of all information--some good and too frequently bad).

 

What's the opinion of this image of Caligula? How accurate, especially with the fair hair and eye coloring?

 

Caligula was not part of the Ahenobarbus [or "red-beard" (literally, "bronze-beard") in Latin] plebeian family of the Domitia gens as was Nero. (Source : Wikipedia)

 

post-3665-0-47827500-1341116908_thumb.png

 

Other than this background information, there was no other information:

 

A marble bust of Caligula restored to its original colours. The colours were identified from particles trapped in the marble.

 

Istanbul Archaeological Museum, room 5 - Reconstruction of the original polychromy of a Roman portrait of emperor Caligula (37-41 a.D.). On a loan by the Glyptotek in Munich for the Bunte G

post-3665-0-28148300-1341117759_thumb.png

post-3665-0-98187600-1341156496_thumb.png

post-3665-0-82915400-1341161651_thumb.png

Edited by guy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The team in Munich has done a lot of research on the theme and, although I've never been to the Glyptothek yet, I think we can say it's about as close to the real thing as the current science allows us to go. It does match in style with other julio-claudian statues' reconstruction (think of the Augustus Prima Porta shown in, amongst other, the Vatican Museum and the Ashmolean of Oxford).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's always going to be a bit speculative though, isn't it? If the image was derived from bones as experts seem extraordinarily capable of, I would accept it, but statues are not actually facsimiles in the Roman world but rather icons of a personality cult, sometimes idealised, sometimes simply symbolic and woefully inaccutrate if recognisable as a 'brand'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if the statue itself appears exactly as it did 2000 years ago, what's to say the person who painted it had ever laid eyes on the lad himself? I would guess he had a not-too-dark brown hair colour, and the painter just used what he had available that most approximated it. That said, the skin tone is pretty realistic for a limited colour pallette.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would guess he had a not-too-dark brown hair colour, and the painter just used what he had available that most approximated it. That said, the skin tone is pretty realistic for a limited colour pallette.

 

Maybe Malcolm McDowell was the correct actor to play Caligula afterall.

 

post-3665-0-94029300-1341416228_thumb.png

 

guy also known as gaius

Edited by guy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is terribly difficult to capture likeness in sculpt. Particularly if the subject has a hand in the process and that subject could have you flayed for recreating his cock-eyedness or hairlip.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Map of the Roman Empire

×